2024 №3 / Сабақты зерттеуде bansho көмегімен оқушы ойлауын визуализациялау
Сабақты зерттеуде bansho көмегімен оқушы ойлауын визуализациялау
Авторлары: Ширли Тэн
DOI: 10.62670/2308-7668.2024.49.3.003
Дереккөз: 49 шығарылым, № 3, 30 қыркүйек 2024 ж.
Басып шығарушы: "Педагогикалық шеберлік орталығы" ЖМ
Құжат түрі: Зерттеу мақаласы
Аннотация
Бұл мақалада bansho дәстүрлі жапондық оқыту техникасының әлеуеті заманауи 4.0 Білім берудегі құнды құрал ретінде қарастырылады. Жылдам технологиялық прогреспен және оқушылардың өзгермелі қажеттіліктерімен сипатталатын қазіргі дәуірде сыни тұрғыдан ойлау, мәселелерді шешу және ынтымақтастық сияқты дағдыларды дамытуға көбірек көңіл бөлінеді. Бұл процесте оқушылардың ойлауын визуализациялау шешуші роль атқарады. Сабақты зерттеу объективі арқылы бұл мақалада зерттеу нәтижелері мен практикалық стратегияларға сүйене отырып, bansho-ны Сабақты зерттеу цикліне қалай кіріктіруге болатыны зерттеледі.
Түйін сөздер: тақтамен жұмыс, Сабақты зерттеу, визуализация, оқушылардың ойлауы
Әдебиеттер
1. Asheesh, A. (2023). Education 4.0: Here are 3 skills that students will need for the jobs of the future. World Economic Forum. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/skillsets-cultivated-by-education-4-0-davos23/ (Accessed: 09.07.2024).
2. Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018). Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4.0 –The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 129–134. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005.
3. Mubarak, Z. K., & Selimin, M. A. (2023). Significance of innovative learning skills in the era of education 4.0. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(3), 339–352.
4. Shatri, K., & Buza, K. (2017). The Use of Visualization in Teaching and Learning Process for Developing Critical Thinking of Students. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 9, 71. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v9i1.p71-74.
5. Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. (2008). Making Thinking Visible. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 57–61.
6. Dictionary of School Education. In. (2014).
7. Tan, S. (2022). Variations of Board Writing Styles in Japanese Schools: How Is It Related to the Teaching of School Subjects? The Teacher Educator, 1–21. [Electronic resource]. –
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2022.2140237.
8. Kusanagi, K. N. (2022). Historical Development of Сабақты зерттеу in Japan. In Сабақты зерттеу as Pedagogic Transfer: A Sociological Analysis (pp. 19–34). Springer Nature Singapore. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5928-8_2.
9. Nozaki, S. (2022). The study of students’ discussion process in a teacher-developed problem-solving learning design: Transcript-based lesson analysis of a social studies lesson. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 11(4), 305–317. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2022-0072.
10. Sarkar Arani, M. R., Fukaya, K., & Lassegard, J. P. (2010). Сабақты зерттеу as Professional Culture in Japanese Schools: An Historical Perspective on Elementary Classroom Practices. In Japan Review (Vol. 22, pp. 171–200): International Research Centre for Japanese Studies, National Institute for the Humanities.
11. Ermeling, B. (2015). Lesson learned from a chalkboard: Slow and Steady Technology Integration. In Teachers College Record (Vol. 13, pp. 1–6).
12. Team, M. D. (2017). A Handbook for Сабақты зерттеу (P. D. S. f. Teachers, Ed.) [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://www.projectmaths.ie/documents/LessonStudy1718/LessonStudyHandbook.pdf.
13. Asami-Johansson, Y., Otaki, K., & Akamoto, J. (2023, 2023-07-10). Board work as a resource for Сабақты зерттеу in mathematics. In D. Paul, C. Csaba, P. Hanna, G. Katalin, & K. Eszter, [Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13)]. Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13), Budapest, Hungary.
14. Baldry, F., Mann, J., Horsman, R., Koiwa, D., & Foster, C. (2022). The use of carefully planned board work to support the productive discussion of multiple student responses in a Japanese problem-solving lesson. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. [Electronic resource]. –
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09511-6.
15. Perlee, A. E. (2022). Boardwork as a roadmap: Introducing subtraction, for Kindergarten (5-and 6-year-old) students. In A. Takahashi, T. Mcdougal, S. Friedkin, & T. Watanabe (Eds.), Educators’ Learning from Сабақты зерттеу (pp. 94–101). Routledge.
16. Tan, S. (2021). Bansho as part of lesson and Сабақты зерттеу: from the origins to the present. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 10(4), 378–392. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2021-0076.
17. Tan, S., Fukaya, K., & Nozaki, S. (2018). Development of bansho (board writing) analysis as a research method to improve observation and analysis of instruction in Сабақты зерттеу. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(3), 230–247. [Electronic resource]. –
URL:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2018-0011.
18. Okazaki, Y., Katsuki, N., & Yoshikawa, A. (2014). Kaku katei no teiji ni okeru gakushuusha no shukan hyouka to shisen bunnseki (Comparison of presentation patterns between classes with slide presentations and classes with a chalkboard). Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report. Education Technology, 114, 17–22.
19. Okazaki, Y., Noguchi, S., & Yoshikawa, A. (2014). Kaku katei no teiji ni okeru gakushuusha no shukan hyouka to shisen bunseki (Gage analysis and subjective assessment of learners in the presentation of the writing processes). Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report. Education Technology, 114(82), 39–44.
20. Hatta, S. (1971). Shakaika bansho jikou no seisen to kouzouka(Selection and structuring of bansho of social studies). In. Tokyo: Meiji Tosho.
21. Dalsgaard, C., & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of Openness: Beyond the Course as an Open Format in Online Education. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (Vol. 16).
22. Tan, S. (2023). Enhancing your teaching with traditional bansho board writing. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/enhancing-your-teaching-with-traditional-bansho-board-writing.
23. Tan, S., Kaskens, J., & Goei, S. L. (2024 (Submitted for publication)). Old school, nieuwe strategieën: Bordwerk (bansho) gebruiken om denken zichtbaar te maken (Old school, new strategies: Using board work (bansho) to make thinking visible). Volgens Bartjens.
24. Greiffenhagen, C. (2014). The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 502–528. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12037.
25. Ninomiya, H., & Kamoda, H. (2012). Bansho to nooto wo kaeru to kodomo ga nobiru (Change the bansho and notes and the pupils will progress). Touyou-kan.
26. Cerbin, B. (2012). Сабақты зерттеу: Using classroom inquiry to improve teaching and learning in higher education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
2. Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018). Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4.0 –The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 129–134. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005.
3. Mubarak, Z. K., & Selimin, M. A. (2023). Significance of innovative learning skills in the era of education 4.0. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(3), 339–352.
4. Shatri, K., & Buza, K. (2017). The Use of Visualization in Teaching and Learning Process for Developing Critical Thinking of Students. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 9, 71. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v9i1.p71-74.
5. Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. (2008). Making Thinking Visible. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 57–61.
6. Dictionary of School Education. In. (2014).
7. Tan, S. (2022). Variations of Board Writing Styles in Japanese Schools: How Is It Related to the Teaching of School Subjects? The Teacher Educator, 1–21. [Electronic resource]. –
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2022.2140237.
8. Kusanagi, K. N. (2022). Historical Development of Сабақты зерттеу in Japan. In Сабақты зерттеу as Pedagogic Transfer: A Sociological Analysis (pp. 19–34). Springer Nature Singapore. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5928-8_2.
9. Nozaki, S. (2022). The study of students’ discussion process in a teacher-developed problem-solving learning design: Transcript-based lesson analysis of a social studies lesson. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 11(4), 305–317. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2022-0072.
10. Sarkar Arani, M. R., Fukaya, K., & Lassegard, J. P. (2010). Сабақты зерттеу as Professional Culture in Japanese Schools: An Historical Perspective on Elementary Classroom Practices. In Japan Review (Vol. 22, pp. 171–200): International Research Centre for Japanese Studies, National Institute for the Humanities.
11. Ermeling, B. (2015). Lesson learned from a chalkboard: Slow and Steady Technology Integration. In Teachers College Record (Vol. 13, pp. 1–6).
12. Team, M. D. (2017). A Handbook for Сабақты зерттеу (P. D. S. f. Teachers, Ed.) [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://www.projectmaths.ie/documents/LessonStudy1718/LessonStudyHandbook.pdf.
13. Asami-Johansson, Y., Otaki, K., & Akamoto, J. (2023, 2023-07-10). Board work as a resource for Сабақты зерттеу in mathematics. In D. Paul, C. Csaba, P. Hanna, G. Katalin, & K. Eszter, [Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13)]. Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13), Budapest, Hungary.
14. Baldry, F., Mann, J., Horsman, R., Koiwa, D., & Foster, C. (2022). The use of carefully planned board work to support the productive discussion of multiple student responses in a Japanese problem-solving lesson. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. [Electronic resource]. –
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09511-6.
15. Perlee, A. E. (2022). Boardwork as a roadmap: Introducing subtraction, for Kindergarten (5-and 6-year-old) students. In A. Takahashi, T. Mcdougal, S. Friedkin, & T. Watanabe (Eds.), Educators’ Learning from Сабақты зерттеу (pp. 94–101). Routledge.
16. Tan, S. (2021). Bansho as part of lesson and Сабақты зерттеу: from the origins to the present. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 10(4), 378–392. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2021-0076.
17. Tan, S., Fukaya, K., & Nozaki, S. (2018). Development of bansho (board writing) analysis as a research method to improve observation and analysis of instruction in Сабақты зерттеу. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(3), 230–247. [Electronic resource]. –
URL:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2018-0011.
18. Okazaki, Y., Katsuki, N., & Yoshikawa, A. (2014). Kaku katei no teiji ni okeru gakushuusha no shukan hyouka to shisen bunnseki (Comparison of presentation patterns between classes with slide presentations and classes with a chalkboard). Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report. Education Technology, 114, 17–22.
19. Okazaki, Y., Noguchi, S., & Yoshikawa, A. (2014). Kaku katei no teiji ni okeru gakushuusha no shukan hyouka to shisen bunseki (Gage analysis and subjective assessment of learners in the presentation of the writing processes). Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report. Education Technology, 114(82), 39–44.
20. Hatta, S. (1971). Shakaika bansho jikou no seisen to kouzouka(Selection and structuring of bansho of social studies). In. Tokyo: Meiji Tosho.
21. Dalsgaard, C., & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of Openness: Beyond the Course as an Open Format in Online Education. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (Vol. 16).
22. Tan, S. (2023). Enhancing your teaching with traditional bansho board writing. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/enhancing-your-teaching-with-traditional-bansho-board-writing.
23. Tan, S., Kaskens, J., & Goei, S. L. (2024 (Submitted for publication)). Old school, nieuwe strategieën: Bordwerk (bansho) gebruiken om denken zichtbaar te maken (Old school, new strategies: Using board work (bansho) to make thinking visible). Volgens Bartjens.
24. Greiffenhagen, C. (2014). The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 502–528. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12037.
25. Ninomiya, H., & Kamoda, H. (2012). Bansho to nooto wo kaeru to kodomo ga nobiru (Change the bansho and notes and the pupils will progress). Touyou-kan.
26. Cerbin, B. (2012). Сабақты зерттеу: Using classroom inquiry to improve teaching and learning in higher education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.