2025 №4 / Comprehensive quality assurance of pedagogical retraining

Comprehensive quality assurance of pedagogical retraining

Author: Tolkyn Aidosova

DOI: 10.62670/2308-7668.2025.54.4.005

Source: Issue: vol. 54 No. 4: 8 January 2026

Publisher: PE "Center of Excellence"

Document type: Analytical review article

Abstract

The article analyses the possibilities and specifics of implementing teacher retraining programmes. It emphasises that retraining should be viewed as a comprehensive professional process that ensures conscious and high-quality adaptation of trainees to teaching activities. The key stages of course organisation are considered. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between the level of teachers’ professional competence and students’ academic performance, as well as the influence of the quality of teacher training on the educational culture of the school, cognitive motivation, and students’ interest in the subject, as documented in the scientific literature.

Key words: pedagogical retraining, professional competence, motivation, school culture

References

1. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis
Archives, 8(1).
2. Zeichner, K. M. (2005). A Research Agenda for Teacher Education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 737–759)
3. Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
4. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching. ASCD.
5. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
6. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.
7. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2010). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. Pearson.
8. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
9. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
10. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
11. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100. [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://tedd.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Grossman-et-al-Teaching-Practice-A-Cross-Professional-Perspective-copy.pdf?utm_source